Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TJ0249

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 April 2010.
Coin SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark 'Fitcoin' - Earlier national, international and Community figurative marks 'coin' - Relative ground for refusal - Relevant public - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
Case T-249/08.

Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2010 II-00059*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:151

Date of document:
21/04/2010
Date lodged:
24/06/2008
Author:
Cúirt Ghinearálta
Country or organisation from which the request originates:
An Iodáil
Form:
Breithiúnas
Authentic language:
Béarla
Type of procedure:
Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú - tá bunús leis
Applicant:
Duine príobháideach
Defendant:
Institiúidí agus comhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh, Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh
Judge-Rapporteur:
Wiszniewska-Białecka
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:





Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 April 2010 – Coin v OHIM – Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin)

(Case T-249/08)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark Fitcoin – Earlier national, international and Community figurative marks coin – Relative ground for refusal – Relevant public – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 26)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2008 (Case R 1429/2007‑1), relating to opposition proceedings between Coin SpA and Dynamiki Zoi AE.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Dynamiki Zoi AE

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark Fitcoin for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41 – Application No 3725298

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Coin SpA

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 160126, for goods in Class 25; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 253233, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 240305, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 169548, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41, extended to Benelux, France, Hungary, Austria and Portugal; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 240286, for goods and services in Class 25, extended to Benelux, France, Hungary and Austria; Community trade mark coin, Registration No 109827, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28 and 35; international trade mark coin, Registration No R 381015, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41, extended to Benelux, Germany, Spain, France, Hungary, Austria, Portugal and Slovenia

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition dismissed in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 15 April 2008 (Case R 1429/2007‑1);

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

Top