This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006TB0037
Case T-37/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 — Meggle v OHIM — Clover (HiQ with trefoil) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-37/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 — Meggle v OHIM — Clover (HiQ with trefoil) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-37/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 — Meggle v OHIM — Clover (HiQ with trefoil) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 142, 7.6.2008, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 09/04/2008
- Date lodged:
- 07/02/2006
- Author:
- Cúirt Chéadchéime
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Gearmáinis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
7.6.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 142/25 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 — Meggle v OHIM — Clover (HiQ with trefoil)
(Case T-37/06) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2008/C 142/44)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Meggle AG (Wasserburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Weberndörfer, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Clover Corporation Limited (Sydney, Australia)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2005 (Case R 1130/2004-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Meggle AG and Clover Corporation Limited
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case. |
|
2. |
The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
