This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006CO0129
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2006. # Autosalone Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community. # Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the European Atomic Energy Community - Overflowing drain - Misinterpretation of the evidence - Measures of inquiry. # Case C-129/06 P.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2006.
Autosalone Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community.
Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the European Atomic Energy Community - Overflowing drain - Misinterpretation of the evidence - Measures of inquiry.
Case C-129/06 P.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2006.
Autosalone Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community.
Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the European Atomic Energy Community - Overflowing drain - Misinterpretation of the evidence - Measures of inquiry.
Case C-129/06 P.
Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2006 I-00131*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2006:775
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2006 – Autosalone Ispra v Commission
(Case C‑129/06 P)
Appeal – Non-contractual liability of the European Atomic Energy Community – Overflowing drain – Misinterpretation of the evidence – Measures of inquiry
1. Appeal – Grounds – Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support its operative part – Plea inoperative (see para. 17)
2. Appeal – Grounds – Review by the Court of the assessment of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (see para. 22)
3. Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts – Inadmissible –Review by the Court of the assessment of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58) (see para. 28)
4. Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see para. 30)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2005 in Case T‑250/02 | Autosalone Ispra | v | Commission | , in which the Court of First Instance dismissed an application for a declaration that the Community was liable for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of an overflowing drain the management and maintenance of which are the responsibility of the Joint Research Centre in Ispra – Breach of the procedural rules concerning the burden of proof. |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
2. |
Orders Autosalone Ispra Snc to pay the costs. |