Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62000TJ0177

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, extended composition) of 17 March 2005.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Council of the European Union.
Dumping - Failure by the Council to adopt a Commission proposal for a regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - Absence of simple majority necessary for the adoption of a regulation - Obligation to state reasons.
Case T-177/00.

Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2005 II-00005*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2005:106

Date of document:
17/03/2005
Date lodged:
30/06/2000
Author:
Cúirt Ghinearálta
Country or organisation from which the request originates:
An Ísiltír
Form:
Breithiúnas
Authentic language:
Béarla
Type of procedure:
Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú - tá bunús leis
Applicant:
Duine príobháideach
Defendant:
Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh, Institiúidí agus comhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh
Judge-Rapporteur:
Legal
Treaty:
Conradh ag bunú Chomhphobal Eacnamaíochta na hEorpa
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 March 2005 − Philips v Council

(Case T-177/00)

Dumping – Failure by the Council to adopt a Commission proposal for a regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty – Absence of simple majority necessary for the adoption of a regulation – Obligation to state reasons

1.                     Applications for interim measures – Actionable measures – Definition – Measures producing binding legal effects – Failure to adopt a proposal for a regulation imposing an anti-dumping duty – Effect of the regulatory nature of the anti-dumping procedure – None (Art. 230 EC; Council Regulation No 384/96, Art. 6(9)) (see paras 30-32)

2.                     Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Failure to adopt a proposal for a regulation imposing a definitive anti‑dumping duty (Art. 253 EC; Council Regulation No 384/96) (see para. 35)

Re:

ACTION for the annulment of the Council’s decision of 8 May 2000 rejecting the proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain parts of television camera systems originating in Japan, submitted by the Commission of the European Communities on 7 April 2000 (document COM(2000) 195 final)

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Annuls the Council’s decision of 8 May 2000 rejecting the proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain parts of television camera systems originating in Japan, submitted by the Commission of the European Communities on 7 April 2000 (document COM(2000) 195 final);

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Top