This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52015XX1218(01)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 15 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.40055 — Parking Heaters — Rapporteur: Bulgaria
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 15 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.40055 — Parking Heaters — Rapporteur: Bulgaria
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 15 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.40055 — Parking Heaters — Rapporteur: Bulgaria
IO C 425, 18.12.2015, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 15/06/2015; Dáta ar glacadh
- Author:
- Coiste Comhairleach um Chleachtais Shriantacha agus Riochtaí Ceannasacha
- Form:
- Tuairim
- Legal basis:
-
- 12012E101
- 21994A0103(01) - A53
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
- Subject matter:
- Directory code:
|
18.12.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 425/12 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 15 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.40055 — Parking Heaters
Rapporteur: Bulgaria
(2015/C 425/07)
|
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the anticompetitive behaviour covered by the draft decision constitutes an agreement and/or concerted practice between undertakings within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
|
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the product and geographic scope of the agreement and/or concerted practice contained in the draft decision. |
|
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertakings concerned by the draft decision have participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
|
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the object of the agreement and/or concerted practice was to restrict competition within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
|
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreement and/or concerted practice have been capable of appreciably affecting trade between the Member States of the EU and the EEA. |
|
6. |
The Advisory Committees agree with the Commission’s assessment as regards the duration of the infringement. |
|
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s draft decision as regards the addressees. |
|
8. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
|
9. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
|
10. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
|
11. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the determination of the duration for the purpose of calculating the fines. |
|
12. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating and no mitigating circumstances applicable in this case. |
|
13. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the reduction of the fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice. |
|
14. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the reduction of the fines based on the 2008 Settlement Notice. |
|
15. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
|
16. |
The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
