This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52015XX1204(02)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 22 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.39563(2) — Retail Food Packaging — Rapporteur: Netherlands
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 22 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.39563(2) — Retail Food Packaging — Rapporteur: Netherlands
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 22 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.39563(2) — Retail Food Packaging — Rapporteur: Netherlands
IO C 402, 4.12.2015, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
4.12.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 402/5 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 22 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.39563(2) — Retail Food Packaging
Rapporteur: Netherlands
(2015/C 402/06)
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the determination of the value of sales. |
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the periods to be taken into account for imposing the fines. |
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment on the mitigating circumstances and ad hoc reductions applicable in this case. |
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice. |
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the inability to pay request. |
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
8. |
The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |