Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 51999SC1309

    Draft Decision of the EC-Norway Joint Committee amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation - Draft common position of the Community

    /* SEC/99/1309 final */

    Please be aware that this draft act does not constitute the final position of the institution.

    51999SC1309

    Draft Decision of the EC-Norway Joint Committee amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation - Draft common position of the Community /* SEC/99/1309 final */


    Draft DECISION OF THE EC-NORWAY JOINT COMMITTEE amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation - Draft common position of the Community

    - (presented by the Commission)

    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

    1. GENERAL

    The rules of origin are essential to the correct functioning of the free trade agreements between the Community and its trading partners.

    The European Council meeting in Essen in December 1994 drew attention to the fact that differences in the origin rules included in the different agreements signed by the Community constituted a barrier to trade. Therefore a programme was initiated aimed at applying identical origin rules and thereby putting trade between the Community, the CEECs, the Baltic States, the EFTA and the EEA countries on the same footing. It also decided that other countries in a situation similar to those mentioned above could be similarly integrated into the system when the time came and that was done for Turkish industrial products from 1.1.1999.

    The origin rules are not immutable. They must be adaptable to the political and economic requirements of the free trade area in which they apply. Therefore, some changes have already been deemed necessary to the rules which entered into force in 1997 and an amendment has already been adopted in the framework of all the agreement to enter into force on 1st January 1999.

    2. AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF ORIGIN IN THE EU-CEECS, EU-EFTA AND EEA AGREEMENTS

    Since the entry into force of the standard protocol on rules of origin and of its amendment of 1999, a few technical amendments to Annex II to the protocols are already necessary and therefore proposed. Those amendments concern products whose raw materials are in short supply in the trade zone.

    3. CONCLUSION

    The annexed draft decision is one of a series of 14 proposals intended to improve the functioning of the common system of origin rules. These 14 proposals should be taken as a single package. If the current arrangements allowing cumulation of working and processing are to remain in force, it is essential that they enter into force at the same time, i.e. on 1 January 2000.

    The Commission therefore calls on the Council to draw up a common position for presentation to the committees provided for in each of the Agreements.

    Draft

    DECISION OF THE EC-NORWAY JOINT COMMITTEE

    amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation

    THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

    Having regard to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway [1], hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", signed in Brussels on 14 May 1973,

    [1] OJ L 171, 27.6.1973, p.2.

    Having regard to Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, hereinafter referred to as "Protocol 3" and in particular Article 38 thereof,

    Whereas the definition of the term "originating products" needs to be amended to ensure the proper operation of the extended system of cumulation which permits the use of materials originating in the European Community, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovenia, Turkey, the European Economic Area (hereinafter referred to as the EEA), Iceland, Norway and Switzerland;

    Whereas it would seem advisable to revise the Articles concerning the amounts in order to fully take into consideration the entry into force of the euro;

    Whereas, to take account of changes in processing techniques and shortages of certain raw materials, some corrections must be made to the list of working and processing requirements which non-originating materials have to fulfil to qualify for originating status,

    HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

    Article 1

    Protocol 3 on the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods of administrative cooperation is hereby amended as follows:

    1. In Articles 21 and 26 the word "Ecu" shall be replaced by "euro".

    2. Article 30 shall be replaced by the following:

    "Article 30

    Amounts expressed in euro

    1. Amounts in the national currency of the exporting country equivalent to the amounts expressed in euro shall be fixed by the exporting country and communicated to the importing countries through the European Commission.

    2. When the amounts exceed the corresponding amounts fixed by the importing country, the latter shall accept them if the products are invoiced in the currency of the exporting country. When the products are invoiced in the currency of EC Member States or another country referred to in Articles 3 and 4, the importing country shall recognise the amount notified by the country concerned.

    3. The amounts to be used in any given national currency shall be the equivalent in that national currency of the amounts expressed in euro as at the first working day of October 1999.

    4. The amounts expressed in euro and their equivalents in the national currencies of Member States and Norway shall be reviewed by the Joint Committee at the request of the Community or Norway. When carrying out this review, the Joint Committee shall ensure that there will be no decrease in the amounts to be used in national currency and shall furthermore consider the desirability of preserving the effects of the limits concerned in real terms. For this purpose, it may decide to modify the amounts expressed in euro."

    3. Annex II shall be amended as follows:

    (a) the entry for HS heading 1904 shall be replaced by:

    >TABLE>

    (b) the entry for HS heading 2207 shall be replaced by:

    >TABLE>

    (c) the entry for HS Chapter 57 shall be replaced by:

    >TABLE>

    (d) the entry for HS heading 8401 shall be replaced by:

    >TABLE>

    (e) the following shall be inserted between the entries for HS heading Nos 9606 and 9612:

    >TABLE>

    Article 2

    That Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

    It is applicable from 1 January 2000.

    Done at Brussels,

    For the Joint Committee

    The President

    FINANCIAL STATEMENT

    1. BUDGET HEADING INVOLVED

    Chapter 12, Article 120 (zero-rated duty)

    2. LEGAL BASIS

    Article 133 of the Treaty.

    3. TITLE OF THE MEASURES

    Draft decision for an amendment to the definition of the concept of "originating products" and the methods of administrative cooperation set out in Protocol 4 to the different Europe Agreements between the EC and the CEECs, the Baltic States and Slovenia and the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in Protocol 3 to the free trade agreements between the EEC and the EFTA countries.

    4. OBJECTIVE

    To revise certain rules concerning the working or processing of non-originating materials that confers originating status and to take into account the introduction of the euro.

    5. cost of the operation

    As the purpose of the amendments is essentially to revise some of the origin rules without any implication on the concessions granted by the agreement, this proposal would not seem to have any financial implications.

    Top