Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 32016R0101R(01)

    Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/101 of 26 October 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for prudent valuation under Article 105(14) (OJ L 21, 28.1.2016)

    IO L 28, 4.2.2016, p. 17–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2016/101/corrigendum/2016-02-04/oj

    Date of document:
    04/02/2016; Dáta foilsithe
    Author:
    An Coimisiún Eorpach
    Form:
    Rialachán tarmligthe Ceartúchán
    Link
    Link
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Modifies:
    Relation Act Comment Subdivision concerned From To
    Corrigendum to 32016R0101
    Link

    4.2.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    L 28/17

    Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/101 of 26 October 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for prudent valuation under Article 105(14)

    ( Official Journal of the European Union L 21 of 28 January 2016 )

    On page 58, Article 9, paragraph 4, subparagraphs (b) and (c):

    for:

    ‘(b)

    Each of the valuation inputs referred to in point (a)(i) shall be treated separately. Where a valuation input consists of a matrix of parameters, AVAs shall be calculated based on the valuation exposures related to each parameter within that matrix. Where a valuation input does not refer to tradable instruments, institutions shall map the valuation input and the related valuation exposure to a set of market tradable instruments. Institutions may reduce the number of parameters of the valuation input for the purpose of calculating AVAs using any appropriate methodology provided the reduced parameters satisfy all of the following requirements:

    (i)

    the total value of the reduced valuation exposure is the same as the total value of the original valuation exposure;

    (ii)

    the reduced set of parameters can be mapped to a set of market tradable instruments;

    (iii)

    the ratio of variance measure 2 defined below over variance measure 1 defined below, based on historical data from the most recent 100 trading days, is less than 0,1.

    (c)

    For the purposes of this paragraph, “variance measure 1” shall mean profit and loss variance of the valuation exposure based on the unreduced valuation input and “variance measure 2” shall mean profit and loss variance of the valuation exposure based on the unreduced valuation input minus the valuation exposure based on the reduced valuation input. Where a reduced number of parameters is used for the purpose of calculating AVAs, the determination that the criteria set out in point (b) are met shall be subject to independent control function review of the netting methodology and internal validation on at least an annual basis.’;

    read:

    ‘(b)

    Each of the valuation inputs referred to in point (a)(i) shall be treated separately. Where a valuation input consists of a matrix of parameters, AVAs shall be calculated based on the valuation exposures related to each parameter within that matrix. Where a valuation input does not refer to tradable instruments, institutions shall map the valuation input and the related valuation exposure to a set of market tradable instruments. Institutions may reduce the number of parameters of the valuation input for the purpose of calculating AVAs using any appropriate methodology provided the reduced parameters satisfy all of the following requirements:

    (i)

    the total value of the reduced valuation exposure is the same as the total value of the original valuation exposure;

    (ii)

    the reduced set of parameters can be mapped to a set of market tradable instruments;

    (iii)

    the ratio of variance measure 2 defined below over variance measure 1 defined below, based on historical data from the most recent 100 trading days, is less than 0,1.

    For the purposes of this paragraph, “variance measure 1” shall mean profit and loss variance of the valuation exposure based on the unreduced valuation input and “variance measure 2” shall mean profit and loss variance of the valuation exposure based on the unreduced valuation input minus the valuation exposure based on the reduced valuation input.

    (c)

    Where a reduced number of parameters is used for the purpose of calculating AVAs, the determination that the criteria set out in point (b) are met shall be subject to independent control function review of the netting methodology and internal validation on at least an annual basis.’
    Top