This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61989TJ0057
Tuomion tiivistelmä
Tuomion tiivistelmä
++++
1 . Officials - Actions - Prior complaint through official channels - Purpose - Consistency between the complaint and the application - Matter of public policy raised by the Court of its own motion - Submission not appearing in the complaint - Conditions regarding admissibility
( Staff Regulations, Arts 90 and 91; Rules of Procedure, Art . 92(2 ) )
2 . Officials - Recruitment - Special rules applicable to overseas staff of the European Association for Cooperation
( Staff Regulations, Arts 31 and 32; Council Regulation No 3018/87, Art . 3 )
1 . The question of admissibility in connection with consistency between the prior complaint through official channels and the application to the Court is a matter of public policy, inasmuch as it relates to the legality of the administrative procedure, which constitutes an essential procedural requirement . The Court is justified in considering the matter of its own motion in particular in view of the very purpose of the administrative procedure, namely to permit an amicable settlement of the differences which have arisen between officials or servants and the administration .
The Court must dismiss as inadmissible any submission which was not relied on in the complaint and which was first raised in the course of the written procedure before it, since the official complaint not only contains no reference to that submission but also does not include any argument from which the defendant institution could have inferred that the applicant intended to make the submission at issue .
2 . When the appointing authority appoints an official on the basis of the normal recruitment rules under the Staff Regulations, the relevant classification criteria may be applied in the context of Articles 31 and 32 thereof .
Where, on the other hand, an official has been appointed pursuant to Regulation No 3018/87 introducing special transitional measures for the recruitment of overseas staff of the European Association for Cooperation as officials of the European Communities, the classification of the person concerned in the appointment decision is lawful in so far as it was determined in accordance with the derogation set out in Article 3 of the regulation, under which the criterion automatically applying relates to the level of salary previously received from the said Association, whose application therefore rules out any reference to the classification criteria under the normal rules .