Reference for a preliminary ruling by the French Cour de Cassation, by judgment of that court of 9 December 1997, in the case of GIE Groupe Concorde, Uni Europe, La Préservatrice Foncière IARD, La Baloise, Réunion Européenne, Allianz, British and Foreign Marine Insurance Co. Ltd and Camat against the Master of the vessel 'Suhadiwarno Panjan', P. T. Perusahan Pelayaran 'Trikoria Lloyd', Pro Ligne Ltd, Sveriges Angarts Assurans Forening, Somaba and Agence maritime Borghans (Case C-440/97)

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the French Cour de Cassation, by judgment of that court of 9 December 1997, in the case of GIE Groupe Concorde, Uni Europe, La Préservatrice Foncière IARD, La Baloise, Réunion Européenne, Allianz, British and Foreign Marine Insurance Co. Ltd and Camat against the Master of the vessel 'Suhadiwarno Panjan', P. T. Perusahan Pelayaran 'Trikoria Lloyd', Pro Ligne Ltd, Sveriges Angarts Assurans Forening, Somaba and Agence maritime Borghans (Case C-440/97)

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the French Cour de Cassation, by judgment of that court of 9 December 1997, in the case of GIE Groupe Concorde, Uni Europe, La Préservatrice Foncière IARD, La Baloise, Réunion Européenne, Allianz, British and Foreign Marine Insurance Co. Ltd and Camat against the Master of the vessel 'Suhadiwarno Panjan', P. T. Perusahan Pelayaran 'Trikoria Lloyd', Pro Ligne Ltd, Sveriges Angarts Assurans Forening, Somaba and Agence maritime Borghans (Case C-440/97)

EÜT C 55, 21.2.1998, p. 21–21 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)