EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92002E000341

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0341/02 by Isidoro Sánchez García (ELDR) to the Council. Entry into force of a single banana-market tariff.

EÜT C 229E, 26.9.2002, p. 77–77 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92002E0341

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0341/02 by Isidoro Sánchez García (ELDR) to the Council. Entry into force of a single banana-market tariff.

Official Journal 229 E , 26/09/2002 P. 0077 - 0077


WRITTEN QUESTION E-0341/02

by Isidoro Sánchez García (ELDR) to the Council

(12 February 2002)

Subject: Entry into force of a single banana-market tariff

Recently, the chairman of ASAGA (the Tenerife farmers' and livestock breeders' association), Mr Fernando Jiménez, forwarded to the Spanish Government's minister for agriculture, livestock breeding and fisheries Mr Miguel Arias Cañete a call from the Canary Islands' banana growers to the effect that advantage should be taken of the Spanish Presidency in order to do what is necessary in order to prevent the entry into force of the single tariff which is due to be introduced in respect of the banana market in 2006, since such a step would have an adverse effect on Canary Islands production.

What view does the Council take of such a call?

Reply

(25 June 2002)

Article 16(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 on the common organisation of the market in bananas, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2587/2001 of 19 December 2001, provides that the current arrangements for importing bananas shall apply until the entry into force, no later than 1 January 2006, of the rate of the common customs tariff for those products established under the procedure provided for in Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

It follows that the Council cannot decide on any amendment to this provision except on the basis of a Commission proposal to that effect, on which inter alia it would have to obtain the EP's opinion. No such amendment is under consideration.

It is worth recalling the international circumstances in which the current arrangements were adopted and the need to put an end to the dispute with third countries, in particular the United States and Ecuador, while at the same time seeking to protect both Community producers and imports from the ACP States with which the Community is also linked by agreements under conditions that are compatible with the Community's WTO commitments.

Top