This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001TJ0162
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2003. # Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Earlier figurative and word marks containing the word GIORGI - Application for Community word mark GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-162/01.
Esimese Astme Kohtu otsus (neljas koda), 9. juuli 2003.
Laboratorios RTB, SL versus Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet (kaubamärgid ja tööstusdisainilahendused) (OHIM).
Ühenduse kaubamärk.
Kohtuasi T-162/01.
Esimese Astme Kohtu otsus (neljas koda), 9. juuli 2003.
Laboratorios RTB, SL versus Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet (kaubamärgid ja tööstusdisainilahendused) (OHIM).
Ühenduse kaubamärk.
Kohtuasi T-162/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2003:199
«(Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Earlier figurative and word marks containing the word GIORGI – Application for Community word mark GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)»
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
9 July 2003 (1)
((Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Earlier figurative and word marks containing the word GIORGI – Application for Community word mark GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94))
In Case T-162/01, Laboratorios RTB, SL, established in Bigues i Riells (Spain), represented by A. Canela Giménez, lawyer,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by O. Montalto and J.F. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agents,defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being:Giorgio Beverly Hills, Inc., established in Santa Monica, California (United States of America), ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 April 2001 (Case R 122/2000-1),THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fourth Chamber),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 22 January 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber),
hereby:
Tiili |
Mengozzi |
Vilaras |
H. Jung |
V. Tilli |
Registrar |
President |