This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001TJ0128
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 6 March 2003. # DaimlerChrysler Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Figurative mark - Representation of a vehicle grille - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Mark devoid of any distinctive character. # Case T-128/01.
Esimese Astme Kohtu otsus (neljas koda), 6. märts 2003.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation versus Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet (kaubamärgid ja tööstusdisainilahendused) (OHIM).
Ühenduse kaubamärk.
Kohtuasi T-128/01.
Esimese Astme Kohtu otsus (neljas koda), 6. märts 2003.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation versus Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet (kaubamärgid ja tööstusdisainilahendused) (OHIM).
Ühenduse kaubamärk.
Kohtuasi T-128/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2003:62
«(Community trade mark – Figurative mark – Representation of a vehicle grille – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Mark devoid of any distinctive character)»
|
||||
(Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 135(4); Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 63)
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
6 March 2003 (1)
((Community trade mark – Figurative mark – Representation of a vehicle grille – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Mark devoid of any distinctive character))
In Case T-128/01, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, established in Auburn Hills, Michigan (United States), represented by T. Cohen Jehoram, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. von Mühlendahl and O. Waelbroeck, acting as Agents,defendant,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 March 2001 (Case R 309/1999-2),THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fourth Chamber),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 23 October 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber),
hereby:
Vilaras |
Tiili |
Mengozzi |
H. Jung |
M. Vilaras |
Registrar |
President |