This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015FO0041(02)
Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 November 2015.#FL and Others v European Police College (CEPOL).#Amicable settlement — Article 90(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Agreement between the parties on the initiative of the Tribunal — Removal from the register.#Case F-41/15 DISS I.
Avaliku Teenistuse Kohtu kolmanda koja esimehe määrus, 12. november 2015.
FL ja teised versus Euroopa Politseikolledž (CEPOL).
Kohtuasi F-41/15 DISS I.
Avaliku Teenistuse Kohtu kolmanda koja esimehe määrus, 12. november 2015.
FL ja teised versus Euroopa Politseikolledž (CEPOL).
Kohtuasi F-41/15 DISS I.
Court reports – Reports of Staff Cases
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:F:2015:132
- Date of document:
- 12/11/2015
- Date lodged:
- 16/09/2015
- Author:
- Avaliku Teenistuse Kohus
- Form:
- Määrus
- Authentic language:
- inglise keel
- Type of procedure:
- Ametniku hagi - pooltevaheline kompromiss, Kahju hüvitamise hagi - pooltevaheline kompromiss
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Svenningsen
- Treaty:
- Liitmisleping
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62015FB0041(01)
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32014Q0714(01)-A90P1: N 3
- 32014Q0714(01)-A91P1: N 5
- 32014Q0714(01)-A91P3: N 6
- Subject matter:
ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE THIRD CHAMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
12 November 2015 ( *1 )
‛Amicable settlement — Article 90(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Agreement between the parties on the initiative of the Tribunal — Removal from the register’
In Case F‑41/15 DISS I,
ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU,
FL, former member of the temporary staff of the European Police College, residing in Reading (United Kingdom),
FM, former member of the contract staff of the European Police College, residing in Basingstoke (United Kingdom),
FO, former member of the contract staff of the European Police College, residing in Tadley (United Kingdom),
represented by L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers,
applicants,
v
European Police College (CEPOL), represented by F. Bánfi and R. Woldhuis, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,
defendant,
THE PRESIDENT OF THE THIRD CHAMBER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
makes the following
Order
|
1 |
By application lodged at the Tribunal Registry on 9 March 2015, FK and six other applicants brought the present action seeking, initially:
|
|
2 |
By letter of 14 July 2015, the Tribunal requested the initial applicants to state their views, pursuant to Article 44(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, on the potential separation of their cases. Those applicants having lodged their observations in that connection on 2 September 2015, the President of the Third Chamber, by order of 16 September 2015 in FK and Others v CEPOL (F‑41/15, EU:F:2015:104), decided, with a view to the sound administration of justice, to separate from the case of FK the cases of, first, FL, FM and FO and, secondly, those of the three other applicants respectively. |
|
3 |
By letter of 14 July 2015, the Registry also informed the parties of the Tribunal’s decision to apply Article 90(1) of the Rules of Procedure and to instruct the Judge-Rapporteur to seek an amicable settlement of the dispute. |
|
4 |
Following an exchange of correspondence between, on one hand, the Tribunal, and, on the other hand, the applicants and the defendant, the latter parties agreed on the definitive terms of an amicable settlement which also dealt with costs. The parties informed the Tribunal of that fact by letters of 9 and 6 October 2015 respectively, supplemented by a letter from the applicants dated 30 October 2015, in which they further indicated that the settlement was a comprehensive agreement which also included the amicable settlement of the dispute which gave rise to Case F‑105/05, FM and FO v CEPOL. |
|
5 |
Having regard to the foregoing, it is necessary, in accordance with Article 91(1) of the Rules of Procedure, to record the agreement between the parties on the amicable settlement concluded on the initiative of the Tribunal and to remove the present case from the register of the Tribunal. |
|
6 |
Under Article 91(3) of the Rules of Procedure, where there is an agreement between the parties as to costs, the decision made follows that agreement. The costs are therefore to be borne by each of the parties in accordance with the terms of their agreement. |
|
On those grounds, THE PRESIDENT OF THE THIRD CHAMBER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL hereby orders: |
|
|
|
Luxembourg,12 November 2015. |
|
W. Hakenberg Registrar S. Van Raepenbusch President |
( *1 ) Language of the case: English.
