This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0380
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2004.#Gustav Schneider v Bundesminister für Justiz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Austria.#Directive 76/207/EEC - Equal treatment for men and women - Promotion - Principle of effective control by the courts - Inadmissibility.#Case C-380/01.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (viies koda), 5. veebruar 2004.
Gustav Schneider versus Bundesminister für Justiz.
Eelotsusetaotlus: Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Austria.
Direktiiv 76/207/EMÜ - Meeste ja naiste võrdne kohtlemine - Vastuvõetamatus.
Kohtuasi C-380/01.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (viies koda), 5. veebruar 2004.
Gustav Schneider versus Bundesminister für Justiz.
Eelotsusetaotlus: Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Austria.
Direktiiv 76/207/EMÜ - Meeste ja naiste võrdne kohtlemine - Vastuvõetamatus.
Kohtuasi C-380/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2004:73
*A9* Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Beschluß vom 13/09/2001 (Zl.EU 2001/0013-1 (99/12/0198))
«(Directive 76/207/EEC – Equal treatment for men and women – Promotion – Principle of effective control by the courts – Inadmissibility)»
|
||||
|
||||
(Art. 234 EC)
(Council Directive 76/207, Art. 6)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
5 February 2004(1)
((Directive 76/207/EEC – Equal treatment for men and women – Promotion – Principle of effective control by the courts – Inadmissibility))
In Case C-380/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Gustav Schneiderand
Bundesminister für Justiz, on the interpretation of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 1976 L 39, p. 40),THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Mr Schneider, represented by P. Ringhofer, Rechtsanwalt, the Austrian Government, represented by H. Dossi, and the Commission, represented by J. Sack and N. Yerrel at the hearing on 23 October 2002,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 10 December 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
in answer to the question referred to it by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) by decision received at the Court on 4 October 2001, hereby rules:
Jann |
Timmermans |
Rosas |
R. Grass |
V. Skouris |
Registrar |
President |