Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 61989CC0018

    Kohtujuristi ettepanek - Lenz - 7. märts 1990.
    Maizena GmbH versus Hauptzollamt Krefeld.
    Eelotsusetaotlus: Bundesfinanzhof - Saksamaa.
    Põllumajandus.
    Kohtuasi C-18/89.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1990:104

    61989C0018

    Opinion of Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered on 7 March 1990. - Maizena GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany. - Agriculture - Production refunds - Art. 5a of Regulation (EEC) nº 2742/75 - Isoglucose used in the production of sorbitol. - Case C-18/89.

    European Court reports 1990 Page I-02587
    Pub.RJ Page Pub somm


    Opinion of the Advocate-General


    ++++

    Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered his Opinion on 7 March 1990 . (*) He proposed that the Court should rule as follows :

    "Article 5a(1 ) of Regulation ( EEC ) No 2742/75, as amended by Regulation ( EEC ) No 1665/77, did not, at the time with which the main proceedings are concerned, preclude the granting of production refunds for products destined for the manufacture of isoglucose, provided that the isoglucose was to be used as an intermediate product, not intended for marketing, in the manufacture of sorbitol ."

    Top