Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014CO0413(01)

Rectification order of 24 October 2017.
Intel Corp. v European Commission.
Rectification of judgment.
Case C-413/14 P.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2017:808

ORDER OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)

24 October 2017 ( *1 )

(Rectification of judgment)

In Case C-413/14 P-REC,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 26 August 2014,

Intel Corporation Inc., established in Wilmington (United States), represented by D.M. Beard QC and by A. Parr and R. Mackenzie, Solicitors,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Commission, represented by T. Christoforou, V. Di Bucci, M. Kellerbauer and N. Khan, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

Association for Competitive Technology Inc., established in Washington (United States), represented by J.-F. Bellis, avocat,

Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir),

interveners at first instance,

THE COURT (Grand Chamber),

composed of K. Lenaerts, President, A. Tizzano, Vice-President, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça (Rapporteur), A. Rosas, J. Malenovský and E. Levits, Presidents of Chambers, E. Juhász, M. Berger, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, M. Vilaras and E. Regan, Judges,

Advocate General: N. Wahl,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

after hearing the Advocate General,

makes the following

Order

1

On 6 September 2017, the Court (Grand Chamber) delivered the judgment in Intel v Commission (C‑413/14 P, EU:C:2017:632).

2

That judgment contains, in the version in the language of the case, a clerical error which it is appropriate for the Court to rectify of its own motion in accordance with Article 154(1) of its Rules of Procedure, which applies to the procedure on appeal pursuant to Article 190(1) of those rules.
 

On those grounds, the Court (Grand Chamber) hereby orders:
 

1.

Paragraph 140 of the judgment of 6 September 2017, Intel v Commission (C‑413/14 P, EU:C:2017:632), in the version in the language of the case, shall be rectified as follows:

‘The analysis of the capacity to foreclose is also relevant in assessing whether a system of rebates which, in principle, falls within the scope of the prohibition laid down in Article 102 TFEU, may be objectively justified. In addition, the exclusionary effect arising from such a system, which is disadvantageous for competition, may be counterbalanced, or outweighed, by advantages in terms of efficiency which also benefit the consumer (judgment of 15 March 2007, British Airways v Commission, C‑95/04 P, EU:C:2007:166, paragraph 86). That balancing of the favourable and unfavourable effects of the practice in question on competition can be carried out in the Commission’s decision only after an analysis of the intrinsic capacity of that practice to foreclose competitors which are at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking.’

 

2.

The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment.

 

Luxembourg, 24 October 2017.

A. Calot Escobar

Registrar

K. Lenaerts

President

( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

Top