This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CB0649
Case C-649/11 P: Order of the Court of 3 October 2012 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), María Constantina Sotelo Ares (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO — Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROSALIA)
Case C-649/11 P: Order of the Court of 3 October 2012 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), María Constantina Sotelo Ares (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO — Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROSALIA)
Case C-649/11 P: Order of the Court of 3 October 2012 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), María Constantina Sotelo Ares (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO — Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROSALIA)
OJ C 101, 6.4.2013, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.4.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 101/5 |
Order of the Court of 3 October 2012 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), María Constantina Sotelo Ares
(Case C-649/11 P) (1)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROSALIA)
2013/C 101/09
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Appellant: Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, Abogado)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent) and María Constantina Sotelo Ares (represented by: C. Lema Devesa, Abogado)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2010 in Case T 421/10 Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Sotelo Ares, by which the General Court rejected the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 (Case R 1804/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between María Constantina Sotelo Ares and Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega is ordered to pay the costs. |