This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TN0132
Case T-132/08: Action brought on 2 April 2008 — ENRI Electronics v OHIM (MaxiBridge)
Case T-132/08: Action brought on 2 April 2008 — ENRI Electronics v OHIM (MaxiBridge)
Case T-132/08: Action brought on 2 April 2008 — ENRI Electronics v OHIM (MaxiBridge)
OJ C 142, 7.6.2008, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.6.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 142/31 |
Action brought on 2 April 2008 — ENRI Electronics v OHIM (MaxiBridge)
(Case T-132/08)
(2008/C 142/56)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: ENRI Electronics GmbH (Adelberg, Germany) (represented by N. Breitenbach, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2008 in Case R 1530/2006-4; |
|
— |
Order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MaxiBridge’ for goods in Classes 9 and 17 (Application No 4 899 647).
Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) inasmuch as the mark in respect of which application is sought does not constitute an indication which needs to be kept freely available.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).