This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TN0072
Case T-72/08: Action brought on 11 February 2008 — Travel Servis v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings)
Case T-72/08: Action brought on 11 February 2008 — Travel Servis v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings)
Case T-72/08: Action brought on 11 February 2008 — Travel Servis v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings)
OJ C 107, 26.4.2008, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.4.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 107/32 |
Action brought on 11 February 2008 — Travel Servis v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings)
(Case T-72/08)
(2008/C 107/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Travel Service a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: S. Hejdová)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eurowings Luftverkehrs AG (Dortmund, Germany)
Form of order sought
— |
Alter the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal in Case R 1515/2006-2 as follows:
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trade mark ‘smartWings’ for goods and services in classes 16, 21, 37, 39, 41 and 43 — Application No 3 650 595
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Eurowings Luftverkehrs AG
Mark or sign cited: The national and international word mark ‘EuroWings’ for goods and services in classes 16 and 41, the national and international word mark ‘EUROWINGS’ for goods and services in classes 39 and 42 and the national word mark ‘WINGSGLASS’ for goods and services in classes 16, 39, 41 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and of essential procedural requirements enshrined in Articles 73 and 79 CTMR.