Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/117/04

    Case C-94/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 20 February 2007 — Dr Andrea Raccanelli v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.

    OJ C 117, 26.5.2007, p. 3–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 117, 26.5.2007, p. 2–3 (MT)

    26.5.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 117/3

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Bonn (Germany) lodged on 20 February 2007 — Dr Andrea Raccanelli v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.

    (Case C-94/07)

    (2007/C 117/04)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Arbeitsgericht Bonn

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Dr Andrea Raccanelli

    Defendant: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.

    Questions referred

    1.

    Should the applicant be regarded as a worker within the meaning of the European concept of ‘worker ’if he is not called upon to provide any more work-related services than are doctoral students with an employment contract concluded pursuant to the Bundesangestelltentarifvertrag (federal collective agreement for public sector workers, ‘BAT/2’)?

    2.

    In the event that the answer to Question 1 is in the negative: must Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (1) be interpreted as meaning that there is no discrimination only if the applicant was at least granted the right to choose between an employment contract and a grant before his period of doctoral study with the defendant began?

    3.

    In the event that the answer to Question 2 is that the applicant should have been granted the opportunity to conclude an employment contract, the question must be asked:

    What are the consequences in law in the event of discrimination against foreign nationals?

    (1)  OJ English Special Edition 1968 (II), p. 475.

    Top