This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/096/37
Case C-150/06 P: Order of the Court of 13 March 2007 — Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA, v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland (Appeal — Directive 67/548/EEC — Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy — Action for damages — Appeal clearly unfounded)
Case C-150/06 P: Order of the Court of 13 March 2007 — Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA, v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland (Appeal — Directive 67/548/EEC — Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy — Action for damages — Appeal clearly unfounded)
Case C-150/06 P: Order of the Court of 13 March 2007 — Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA, v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland (Appeal — Directive 67/548/EEC — Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy — Action for damages — Appeal clearly unfounded)
OJ C 96, 28.4.2007, p. 21–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 96/21 |
Order of the Court of 13 March 2007 — Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA, v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland
(Case C-150/06 P) (1)
(Appeal - Directive 67/548/EEC - Refusal to declassify rosin as a dangerous substance - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Breach of the right to an effective legal remedy - Action for damages - Appeal clearly unfounded)
(2007/C 96/37)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA, Cray Valley Iberica SA (represented by: C. Mereu and K. van Maldegem, avocats)
Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and F. Simonetti, Agents), Republic of Finland
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2005 in Case T-369/03 Arizona Chemical and Others v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance declared inadmissible an action for annulment of Commission Decision D(2003)430245 of 20 August 2003, rejecting the applicant's request to withdraw rosin from the list of dangerous substances set out in Annex I to Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ L 196, p. 1)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Arizona Chemical BV, Eastman Belgium BVBA and Cray Valley Iberica SA shall bear the costs. |