This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62002CJ0115
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2003. # Administration des douanes et droits indirects v Rioglass SA and Transremar SL. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - France. # Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - Procedures for detention under customs control - Goods in transit intended for the market of a non-member country - Spare parts for motor cars. # Case C-115/02.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2003.
Administration des douanes et droits indirects v Rioglass SA and Transremar SL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - France.
Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - Procedures for detention under customs control - Goods in transit intended for the market of a non-member country - Spare parts for motor cars.
Case C-115/02.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2003.
Administration des douanes et droits indirects v Rioglass SA and Transremar SL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - France.
Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - Procedures for detention under customs control - Goods in transit intended for the market of a non-member country - Spare parts for motor cars.
Case C-115/02.
European Court Reports 2003 I-12705
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:587
«(Free movement of goods – Measures having equivalent effect – Procedures for detention under customs control – Goods in transit intended for the market of a non-member country – Spare parts for motor cars)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Arts 28 EC to 30 EC)
(Arts 28 EC and 30 EC)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
23 October 2003 (1)
((Free movement of goods – Measures having equivalent effect – Procedures for detention under customs control – Goods in transit intended for the market of a non-member country – Spare parts for motor cars))
In Case C-115/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Cour de cassation (France) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Administration des douanes et droits indirectsand
Rioglass SA, Transremar SL on the interpretation of Article 28 EC,THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 20 March 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
in answer to the question referred to it by the Cour de cassation by judgment of 26 March 2002, hereby rules:
Puissochet |
Gulmann |
Skouris |
Macken |
Cunha Rodrigues |
|
R. Grass |
V. Skouris |
Registrar |
President |