1.

Can the rule laid down in the second part of the first sentence and in the second sentence of Article 177(3) of the Sudski poslovnik (Rules of Procedure of the Courts), which provides that ‘a case before a court of second instance shall be deemed to be closed on the date on which the decision is sent from the court office, after the case has been returned by the Registration Service. The Registration Service shall be required to return the file to the court office as promptly as possible after receipt thereof. The decision shall then be notified within a further period of eight days’ be considered compatible with Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter?

2.

Must the courts in civil proceedings, when adopting decisions, take account of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 of 7 December 2020 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses, (1) with all annexes, and Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 of 7 December 2020 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses, (2) with all annexes, having regard to all the circumstances of the specific case in which, in the absence of this decision, there would have been a transfer of EUR 35 000 000,00 from the account of a commercial company in a Member State of the European Union to the account of a commercial company in the Russian Federation, it being almost impossible, as things stand at present, for a commercial company from the European Union to obtain compensation for the termination of a contractual relationship by a commercial company in the Russian Federation?