EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0255
Case T-255/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Nouwen v Council
Case T-255/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Nouwen v Council
Case T-255/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Nouwen v Council
OJ C, C/2024/4336, 15.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4336/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
![]() |
Official Journal |
EN C series |
C/2024/4336 |
15.7.2024 |
Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Nouwen v Council
(Case T-255/24)
(C/2024/4336)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Martijn Frederik Nouwen (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Weijers, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the Council decision of 7 March 2024 under the reference SGS 24/00008 not to grant (partial) access to e-mail messages requested by the applicant under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; |
— |
order the Council to pay the costs of the applicant under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court and to pay the costs of any interveners. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant puts forward three pleas in law in support of the action.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging the incomplete or careless review of the application, or, at least, an insufficient statement of reasons therefor. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging the unjustified refusal to grant access to the declined e-mail messages, or at least an insufficient statement of reasons for the decision to do so:
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging the unjustified refusal to grant partial access or, at least, an insufficient statement of reasons for the decision to do so. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4336/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)