This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0622
Case C-622/23, rhtb: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 October 2023 — rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
Case C-622/23, rhtb: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 October 2023 — rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
Case C-622/23, rhtb: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 October 2023 — rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
OJ C, C/2023/1438, 18.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1438/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
C/2023/1438 |
18.12.2023 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 October 2023 — rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
(Case C-622/23, rhtb)
(C/2023/1438)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: rhtb: projekt gmbh
Respondent on a point of law: Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
Question referred
Must Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) read in conjunction with Article 73 of that directive be interpreted as meaning that the amount which a customer owes to a contractor even where the work has not been (fully) carried out, but the contractor was ready to provide the service and, through circumstances attributable to the customer (for example, cancellation of the work), was prevented from doing so, is subject to VAT?
(1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1438/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)