Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023CN0606

    Case C-606/23, Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp and KIA Auto: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 4 October 2023 — AS ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’, AS ‘KIA Auto’ v Konkurences padome

    OJ C, C/2023/1437, 18.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1437/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1437/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    Series C

    C/2023/1437

    18.12.2023

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 4 October 2023 — AS ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’, AS ‘KIA Auto’ v Konkurences padome

    (Case C-606/23, Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp and KIA Auto)

    (C/2023/1437)

    Language of the case: Latvian

    Referring court

    Administratīvā apgabaltiesa

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: AS ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’, AS ‘KIA Auto’

    Defendant: Konkurences padome

    Questions referred

    1.

    In accordance with Article 101(1) TFEU, for the purposes of determining the existence of a prohibited agreement establishing restrictions in respect of car warranties which, in order for the car’s warranty to remain valid, oblige or induce car owners to carry out the repair and maintenance of that car solely at authorised representatives of the car’s manufacturer and to use the original spare parts of that manufacturer in its servicing, must the competition authority demonstrate the existence of actual and real restrictive effects on competition?

    2.

    In accordance with Article 101(1) TFEU, for the purposes of determining the existence of the agreement mentioned in the first question referred, is it sufficient for the competition authority to demonstrate solely the existence of potential restrictive effects on competition?

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1437/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top