This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document E2022P0012
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 26 September 2022 in the case of Maximilian Maier (Case E-12/22) 2023/C 49/06
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 26 September 2022 in the case of Maximilian Maier (Case E-12/22) 2023/C 49/06
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 26 September 2022 in the case of Maximilian Maier (Case E-12/22) 2023/C 49/06
PUB/2022/1401
OJ C 49, 9.2.2023, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.2.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 49/7 |
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 26 September 2022 in the case of Maximilian Maier
(Case E-12/22)
(2023/C 49/06)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court, dated 26 September 2022, from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein (the Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 30 September 2022, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Maximilian Maier on the following question:
Is a national provision, according to which a lawyer, who normally practices his profession in a Member State other than the one in which he obtained his qualification, is not authorised to be appointed as a legal aid lawyer, legal aid defence counsel or public defender, compatible with Directive 98/5/EC (1)?