Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document E2016J0012

    Judgment of the Court of 27 November 2017 in Case E-12/16 — Marine Harvest ASA supported by the Federation of Norwegian Industries (Norsk Industri) v EFTA Surveillance Authority supported by the Kingdom of Norway (Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — State aid — Fish and other marine products — Material scope of the EEA Agreement — Protocol 9 — Surveillance competence)

    OJ C 119, 5.4.2018, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.4.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 119/9


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

    of 27 November 2017

    in Case E-12/16

    Marine Harvest ASA supported by the Federation of Norwegian Industries (Norsk Industri) v EFTA Surveillance Authority supported by the Kingdom of Norway

    (Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — State aid — Fish and other marine products — Material scope of the EEA Agreement — Protocol 9 — Surveillance competence)

    (2018/C 119/10)

    In Case E-12/16, Marine Harvest ASA supported by the Federation of Norwegian Industries (Norsk Industri) v EFTA Surveillance Authority supported by the Kingdom of Norway – APPLICATION for the annulment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision of 27 July 2016 in ESA Case No 79116, and for a declaration that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has the competence and obligation to carry out surveillance of State aid to the fisheries sector, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur), and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 27 November 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

    The Court hereby:

    1.

    Dismisses the application as unfounded.

    2.

    Orders Marine Harvest ASA to bear its own costs and the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

    3.

    Orders the interveners to bear their own costs.


    Top