This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/082/17
Case C-373/05 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2007 — Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Decision not to promote an official to Grade LA 5 — Previous complaint — Identity of subject-matter and legal basis — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Case C-373/05 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2007 — Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Decision not to promote an official to Grade LA 5 — Previous complaint — Identity of subject-matter and legal basis — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Case C-373/05 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2007 — Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Decision not to promote an official to Grade LA 5 — Previous complaint — Identity of subject-matter and legal basis — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/9 |
Order of the Court of 22 January 2007 — Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities
(Case C-373/05 P) (1)
(Appeal - Officials - Decision not to promote an official to Grade LA 5 - Previous complaint - Identity of subject-matter and legal basis - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
(2007/C 82/17)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Bart Nijs (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy and G. Corstens, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2005 in Case T-377/04 Nijs v Court of Auditors, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the action for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors not to promote the appellant to the post of translator-reviser (LA 5) in the 2003 promotion exercise
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed; |
|
2. |
Mr Nijs is ordered to pay the costs. |