Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/261/50

    Case T-246/06: Action brought on 8 September 2006 — Redcats v OHIM — Revert & Cía (REVERIE)

    OJ C 261, 28.10.2006, p. 26–27 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.10.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 261/26

    Action brought on 8 September 2006 — Redcats v OHIM — Revert & Cía (REVERIE)

    (Case T-246/06)

    (2006/C 261/50)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Redcats SA (Roubaix, France) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Manuel Revert y Cia SA (Onteniente, Spain)

    Form of order sought

    —

    […] Thus the contested decision of the Board of Appeal of the OHIM must be reversed.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘REVERIE’ for goods in classes 16, 20 and 24 — application No 2 146 447

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Manuel Revert y Cía., SA

    Mark or sign cited: The Community figurative mark ‘REVERT’ for goods and services in classes 24, 25 and 39

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in relation to the contested goods in class 24

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: The conflicting trade marks have no similarities from a visual, phonetic and conceptual point of view for Spanish, French or English speaking consumers. The fact that the earlier trade mark and the trade mark applied for cover the same products does therefore not create a risk of confusion in the mind of the public.

    Top