This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/121/21
Case T-4/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2006 — Strack v Commission (Officials — Official informing OLAF of possible irregularities — Decision of OLAF to close the investigation — Act adversely affecting an official — Standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Case T-4/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2006 — Strack v Commission (Officials — Official informing OLAF of possible irregularities — Decision of OLAF to close the investigation — Act adversely affecting an official — Standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Case T-4/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2006 — Strack v Commission (Officials — Official informing OLAF of possible irregularities — Decision of OLAF to close the investigation — Act adversely affecting an official — Standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 121, 20.5.2006, p. 12–12
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.5.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 121/12 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2006 — Strack v Commission
(Case T-4/05) (1)
(Officials - Official informing OLAF of possible irregularities - Decision of OLAF to close the investigation - Act adversely affecting an official - Standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2006/C 121/21)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Guido Strack (Wasserliesch, Germany) (represented by: R. Schmitt, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Ladenburger and H. Kraemer, acting as Agents)
Re:
First, an application for annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 5 February 2004 to close the investigation number OF/2002/0356 and the final case report on which that decision was based dated 5 February 2004 and, secondly, an application to reopen that investigation and to draw up a new final case report.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |