Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/096/21

    Case T-74/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Nestlé v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative trade mark including the word element QUICKY — Earlier Community, national and international figurative trade marks including the word element QUICK — Earlier national and international word marks QUICK — Earlier national word marks QUICKIES — Likelihood of confusion — Refusal to register — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

    OJ C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 11–12 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.4.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 96/11


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Nestlé v OHIM

    (Case T-74/04) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative trade mark including the word element ‘QUICKY’ - Earlier Community, national and international figurative trade marks including the word element ‘QUICK’ - Earlier national and international word marks ‘QUICK’ - Earlier national word marks ‘QUICKIES’ - Likelihood of confusion - Refusal to register - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

    (2006/C 96/21)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties:

    Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Evrard and P. Péters, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

    Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Quick restaurants SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers)

    Action

    brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2003 (Case R 922/2001-2) regarding opposition proceedings between Société des Produits Nestlé SA and Quick restaurants SA

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    dismisses the action;

    2.

    orders the applicant to pay the costs in their entirety.


    (1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.


    Top