EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/082/10

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2005 in Case C-125/04 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Collège d'arbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages): Guy Denuit, Betty Cordenier v Transorient – Mosaïque Voyages and Culture SA (Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Reference to the Court — National court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 EC — Arbitration panel)

OJ C 82, 2.4.2005, p. 5–5 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.4.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/5


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 27 January 2005

in Case C-125/04 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Collège d'arbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages): Guy Denuit, Betty Cordenier v Transorient – Mosaïque Voyages and Culture SA (1)

(Questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Reference to the Court - National court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 EC - Arbitration panel)

(2005/C 82/10)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-125/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Collège d'arbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages (Belgium), made by decision of 4 December 2003, received at the Court on 8 March 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between Guy Denuit, Betty Cordenier and Transorient – Mosaïque Voyages and Culture SA – the Court (Fourth Chamber) composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

The Court is not competent to rule on questions referred to it by the College d'àrbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages.


(1)  OJ C 156 of 12.06.2004.


Top