This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/069/32
Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2004 in Case T-269/04 IDOM SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Withdrawal of application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2004 in Case T-269/04 IDOM SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Withdrawal of application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2004 in Case T-269/04 IDOM SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Withdrawal of application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 69, 19.3.2005, p. 16–17
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.3.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/16 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 13 December 2004
in Case T-269/04 IDOM SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Withdrawal of application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
(2005/C 69/32)
Language of the case: Spanish
In Case T-269/04, IDOM SA, established in Bilbao, Spain, represented by Tatiana Villate Consonni, lawyer, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: Ignacio de Medrano Caballero), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the OHIM being IDOM Inc., established in New Jersey (United States), represented by Fry Heath and Spence LLP, lawyers; appeal against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 27 April 2004 (Case R 153/2003-2), concerning registration of the sign IDOM as a Community trade mark, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, M.E. Martins Ribeiro and K. Jürimäe, Judges; Registrar, H. Jung, made an order on 13 December 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
There is no further need to adjudicate on the appeal |
|
2. |
Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |