This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/314/48
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 October 2004 in Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Open competition — Preselection tests — Neutralisation of a multiple-choice question — Principle of proportionality — Breach of the competition notice)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 October 2004 in Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Open competition — Preselection tests — Neutralisation of a multiple-choice question — Principle of proportionality — Breach of the competition notice)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 October 2004 in Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Open competition — Preselection tests — Neutralisation of a multiple-choice question — Principle of proportionality — Breach of the competition notice)
OJ C 314, 18.12.2004, p. 19–19
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 314/19 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 21 October 2004
in Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(Officials - Open competition - Preselection tests - Neutralisation of a multiple-choice question - Principle of proportionality - Breach of the competition notice)
(2004/C 314/48)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann, residing in Berlin (Germany), represented by Y. Block, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decision of the selection board in open competition COM/A/11/01 not to admit the applicant to the tests following the preselection tests, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. Garcia-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application as inadmissible in that it seeks annulment of the decision of 19 July 2002; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the application as unfounded in that it seeks annulment of the decision of 4 June 2002; |
|
3. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |