This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2003/213/05
Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2003 in Case C-424/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): CS Communications & Systems Austria GmbH v Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt (Public contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Review procedures for the award of public contracts — Action for annulment of a decision of the contracting authority — Application for interim measures — Duty or discretion of the body responsible for review procedures to take account of the prospects of success of the substantive claim — Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Question the answer to which does not admit of any reasonable doubt)
Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2003 in Case C-424/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): CS Communications & Systems Austria GmbH v Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt (Public contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Review procedures for the award of public contracts — Action for annulment of a decision of the contracting authority — Application for interim measures — Duty or discretion of the body responsible for review procedures to take account of the prospects of success of the substantive claim — Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Question the answer to which does not admit of any reasonable doubt)
Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2003 in Case C-424/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): CS Communications & Systems Austria GmbH v Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt (Public contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Review procedures for the award of public contracts — Action for annulment of a decision of the contracting authority — Application for interim measures — Duty or discretion of the body responsible for review procedures to take account of the prospects of success of the substantive claim — Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Question the answer to which does not admit of any reasonable doubt)
OJ C 213, 6.9.2003, p. 3–4
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)