Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0446

Case T-446/24: Action brought on 24 August 2024 – EV and Others v Council

OJ C, C/2024/5849, 7.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5849/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5849/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5849

7.10.2024

Action brought on 24 August 2024 – EV and Others v Council

(Case T-446/24)

(C/2024/5849)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: EV, EW, EY (represented by: H. over de Linden, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

—

annul Article 3 ea, paragraph 3, point (a) of Council Regulation (EU) 2024/1745 of 24 June 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (1)(hereafter ‘the contested regulation’), and annul Article 4ha, paragraph 3, point (a) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1744 of 24 June 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (2), (hereafter ‘the contested decision’), in so far as it concerns the addition of replicas of historical ships to the existing articles of the contested acts.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on seven pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of an essential procedural requirement to state reasons.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment and a lack of a solid factual basis.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging illegality.

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of ownership rights and infringement of the reputation of claimant.

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.

6.

Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of freedom to conduct a business.

7.

Seventh plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to good administration and infringement of the right of effective remedy and to a fair trial.

(1)  OJ L, 2024/1745.

(2)  OJ L, 2024/1744.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5849/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top