This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0333
Case T-333/24: Action brought on 2 July 2024 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu)
Case T-333/24: Action brought on 2 July 2024 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu)
Case T-333/24: Action brought on 2 July 2024 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu)
OJ C, C/2024/4873, 12.8.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4873/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/4873 |
12.8.2024 |
Action brought on 2 July 2024 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu)
(Case T-333/24)
(C/2024/4873)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Huda Beauty Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: R. Drozdz and J. Wachinger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Norbert Schulz (Hamburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark déjà-vu – EU trade mark No 2 214 492
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 April 2024 in Case R 2487/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the application for revocation in relation to the goods in Class 3 ‘perfumery’ and ordered the parties to bear their own costs in the cancellation and appeal proceedings; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)