Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024CN0494

    Case C-494/24 P: Appeal brought on 16 July 2024 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 May 2024 in Case T-471/22 Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union

    OJ C, C/2024/5224, 2.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5224/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5224/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    C series

    C/2024/5224

    2.9.2024

    Appeal brought on 16 July 2024 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 May 2024 in Case T-471/22 Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union

    (Case C-494/24 P)

    (C/2024/5224)

    Language of the case: Bulgarian

    Parties

    Appellant: Issam Anbouba (represented by: St. Koev, advokat)

    Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The appellant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul in part the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2024, in Case T-471/22 (1), Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union and

    —

    annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1035 (2) of 25 May 2023 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1027 (3) of 25 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, in so far as Mr Issam Anbouba was added to the list of persons subject to sanctions, or refer the case back to the General Court on this point for a ruling on the substance;

    —

    order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.

    Grounds of appeal and main arguments

    1.

    		 Error of law on the part of the General Court, consisting in a breach of EU law, in so far as it considered that the Council was entitled to presume that he is a leading business person and to identify the founders of Cham Holding to include them, on that basis, on the Council’s lists;

    2.

    		 Error of law on the part of the General Court, consisting in a breach of the rules of administration of evidence , in so far as it failed to examine evidence adduced by the appellant and in so far as it gave unjustified priority to evidence submitted by the Council and to parts of that evidence.

    3.

    		 Error of law on the part of the General Court, consisting in a breach of the rules of procedure to the detriment of the appellant’s interests, in so far as it did not take into consideration evidence submitted by the appellant and in so far as it gave unjustified priority to evidence submitted by the Council and to parts of that evidence.

    (1)  EU:T:2024:315

    (2)   OJ 2023 L 139, p. 49.

    (3)   OJ 2023 L 139, p. 1.

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5224/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top