Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0559

    Case T-559/23: Action brought on 8 September 2023 — Skins IP v EUIPO — Symphony (S SKINS)

    OJ C, C/2023/349, 30.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/349/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/349/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    Series C

    C/2023/349

    30.10.2023

    Action brought on 8 September 2023 — Skins IP v EUIPO — Symphony (S SKINS)

    (Case T-559/23)

    (C/2023/349)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Skins IP Ltd (Shirebrook, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Symphony Holdings Ltd (Hamilton, Bermuda)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark S SKINS — European Union trade mark No 5 310 511

    Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2023 in Case R 1796/2022-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    decide the appeal and revoke the class 10 specification in its entirety and revoke the class 25 specification save for the following goods:

    Class 25: ‘Clothing, headgear, namely compression clothing, fitness wear, running wear’;

    —

    order EUIPO and the intervener (if the other party to the EUIPO proceedings duly participates as intervener) do bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant for annulment.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of article 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/349/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top