Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TB0385

    Case T-385/23: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

    OJ C, C/2024/2624, 22.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2624/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2624/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    C series

    C/2024/2624

    22.4.2024

    Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

    (Case T-385/23)  (1)

    (Action for annulment - Decision of a Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to bring a case to judgment - Article 42(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Procedural act of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Lack of jurisdiction)

    (C/2024/2624)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Parties

    Applicant: Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: A. Şandru and M.-A. Ion, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by: L. De Matteis, F.-R. Radu and E. Farhat, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Tenth Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 8 December 2022 by which it referred the case concerning him for judgment.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The action is dismissed.

    2.

    There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA).

    3.

    Mr Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși shall bear his own costs and pay those of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

    4.

    Mr Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși, the Council, the Commission, the Parliament and ECBA shall bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

    (1)   OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2624/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top