EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0379
Case C-379/23, Guldbrev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen
Case C-379/23, Guldbrev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen
Case C-379/23, Guldbrev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen
OJ C 296, 21.8.2023, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.8.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/24 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen
(Case C-379/23, Guldbrev)
(2023/C 296/25)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Guldbrev AB
Respondent: Konsumentombudsmannen
Questions referred
1. |
Does the valuation and purchase of gold from consumers constitute a product (combined product) within the meaning of Article 2(c), (d) and (i) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/29 (1) concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market in a situation such as that at issue before the national court? |
2. |
If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the valuation of gold in the situation at issue before the national court constitute a product within the meaning of the directive? |