EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0610
Case T-610/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare)
Case T-610/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare)
Case T-610/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare)
OJ C 441, 21.11.2022, p. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 441/26 |
Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare)
(Case T-610/22)
(2022/C 441/36)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Jannah Nienaber (Cloppenburg, Germany), Andreas Nienaber (Cloppenburg) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark BoneKare — Application No 18 411 756
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2022 in Case R 348/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |