This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0624
Case T-624/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – RS v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Fixed-term contract – No conversion into contract of indefinite duration – Conversion of contracts – Criteria – Manifest error of assessment – Prior notice – Conflict of interest – Action for annulment and for damages)
Case T-624/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – RS v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Fixed-term contract – No conversion into contract of indefinite duration – Conversion of contracts – Criteria – Manifest error of assessment – Prior notice – Conflict of interest – Action for annulment and for damages)
Case T-624/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – RS v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Fixed-term contract – No conversion into contract of indefinite duration – Conversion of contracts – Criteria – Manifest error of assessment – Prior notice – Conflict of interest – Action for annulment and for damages)
OJ C, C/2024/5094, 26.8.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5094/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN C series |
C/2024/5094 |
26.8.2024 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – RS v EIB
(Case T-624/22) (1)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Fixed-term contract - No conversion into contract of indefinite duration - Conversion of contracts - Criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Prior notice - Conflict of interest - Action for annulment and for damages)
(C/2024/5094)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: RS (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo, A. García Sánchez and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 20 December 2021 not to convert his employment contract into a contract of indefinite duration and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result. He also seeks annulment of the letter of the EIB of 20 December 2021 confirming the decision not to convert the contract.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders RS to pay the costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5094/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)