Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022CN0640

    Case C-640/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Gelderland (Netherlands) lodged on 12 October 2022 — Fiscale Eenheid Achmea BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Amsterdam

    OJ C 35, 30.1.2023, p. 25–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.1.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 35/25

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Gelderland (Netherlands) lodged on 12 October 2022 — Fiscale Eenheid Achmea BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Amsterdam

    (Case C-640/22)

    (2023/C 35/29)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Rechtbank Gelderland

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Fiscale Eenheid Achmea BV

    Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Amsterdam

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 135(1)(g) of the VAT Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that unit-holders in a pension fund such as the one at issue in the main proceedings can be regarded as bearing investment risk, and does this mean that the pension fund constitutes a ‘special investment fund’ within the meaning of that provision? Is it relevant in that regard:

    —

    whether unit-holders bear an individual investment risk or is it sufficient that unit-holders as a collective — and no one else — bear the consequences of the investment results?

    —

    what the magnitude of the collective or individual risk is?

    —

    to what extent the amount of the pension benefit depends also on other factors, such as the number of years of pension accrual, salary level and the actuarial interest rate?

    —

    that the pension fund has no active accrual from 1 January 2018 and is obliged to proceed with a collective value transfer to an insurer or another pension fund because of the low policy coverage ratio?

    2.

    Does the principle of tax neutrality require that, for the application of Article 135(1)(g) of the VAT Directive, in the case of funds which are not UCITS, (2) it must be assessed not only whether they are comparable to UCITS but also whether, from the perspective of the average consumer, they are comparable to other funds that are not UCITS funds but are regarded by the Member State as special investment funds?

    (1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

    (2)  Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities.

    Top