EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0567
Case C-567/22 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by Vasile Dumitrescu, Guido Schwarz against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-531/16, Dumitrescu and Schwarz v Commission
Case C-567/22 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by Vasile Dumitrescu, Guido Schwarz against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-531/16, Dumitrescu and Schwarz v Commission
Case C-567/22 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by Vasile Dumitrescu, Guido Schwarz against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-531/16, Dumitrescu and Schwarz v Commission
OJ C 441, 21.11.2022, p. 12–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 441/12 |
Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by Vasile Dumitrescu, Guido Schwarz against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-531/16, Dumitrescu and Schwarz v Commission
(Case C-567/22 P)
(2022/C 441/17)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: Vasile Dumitrescu, Guido Schwarz (represented by: L. Levi, J.-N. Louis, avocats)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The appellants claim that the Court should:
— |
set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 June 2022 in Case T-531/16, Dumitrescu and Schwarz v Commission; |
— |
refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellants’ action at first instance is well founded; |
— |
order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
In support of their appeal, the appellants rely on three grounds:
The first ground of appeal alleges infringement of Article 45 TFEU, infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons, error of legal characterisation and distortion of the contents of the file;
The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of the purpose of Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, breach of the general principle of the right of an official to retain personal links with the place where his or her principal interests are situated, infringement of Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and distortion of the contents of the file;
The third ground of appeal alleges breach of the principle of equal treatment.