EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CN0287

Case C-287/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 May 2022 — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A.

OJ C 318, 22.8.2022, p. 23–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.8.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/23


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 May 2022 — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A.

(Case C-287/22)

(2022/C 318/33)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: YQ, RJ

Defendant: Getin Noble Bank S.A.

Question referred

In the light of the principles of effectiveness and proportionality, do Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13 (1) preclude an interpretation of national legislation or of national case-law according to which a national court may, in particular because of a consumer’s obligations to settle payments with a seller or supplier or the sound financial situation of the seller or supplier, dismiss a consumer’s application for an interim measure (securing of the action) to suspend, during the course of the proceedings, the performance of a contract which is likely to be declared invalid as a result of the removal of the unfair terms from it?


(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).


Top