EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CA0166

Case C-166/22, Hellfire Massy Residents Association: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Hellfire Massy Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála, Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 12 — System of strict protection for certain animal species — Article 16 — Derogation — Procedure for granting such a derogation — Right of public participation)

OJ C 296, 21.8.2023, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.8.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/9


Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Hellfire Massy Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála, Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, Attorney General

(Case C-166/22, (1) Hellfire Massy Residents Association)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Article 12 - System of strict protection for certain animal species - Article 16 - Derogation - Procedure for granting such a derogation - Right of public participation)

(2023/C 296/09)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hellfire Massy Residents Association

Respondents: An Bord Pleanála, Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, Attorney General

Other parties: South Dublin County Council, An Taisce — The National Trust for Ireland, Save Our Bride Otters

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 12 and 16 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora

must be interpreted as meaning that a piece of national legislation intended to transpose those provisions into national law cannot be regarded as contrary to that directive on the ground that that piece of national legislation does not provide for (i) a development consent procedure which involves a decision by a competent authority determining whether it is necessary to apply for a derogation under Article 16 of the abovementioned directive because of matters identified following the grant of development consent to a project and/or whether surveys are required to that end or (ii) public participation in that derogation procedure.


(1)  OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.


Top