This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0356
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Future Motion, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HYPERCORE – Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-356/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.
Future Motion, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HYPERCORE – Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-356/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.
Future Motion, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HYPERCORE – Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-356/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:380